- The Product Post
- Posts
- Stop Being a Product Perfectionist: A PM’s Guide to Shipping Meaningful Products Without Losing Your Mind
Stop Being a Product Perfectionist: A PM’s Guide to Shipping Meaningful Products Without Losing Your Mind
I’m about to hit you with some truth that might make a few “product excellence” zealots clutch their pearls, but after years of shipping products and watching countless PMs burn themselves out chasing perfection, it’s time we had this talk.
Your obsession with maximizing everything is killing your product.
The Perfectionist’s Paradox
In my earlier days as a PM, I used to be the one who’d spend weeks perfecting feature specs, agonizing over every pixel in the mockups, and driving engineers crazy with “just one more tweak.” I thought I was being thorough. Professional. Excellence-driven.
I was actually being an idiot.
Here’s what nobody tells you in those fancy PM books: The difference between a good product and a perfect product usually isn’t worth the time it takes to get there. And while you’re polishing that golden feature to perfection, your competitors are shipping three “good enough” features that customers are actually using.
Before you start thinking I’m advocating for mediocrity, let me explain. Satisficing (a blend of “satisfy” and “suffice”) is about finding the sweet spot between “this is garbage” and “this is perfect.” It’s about making conscious decisions about what’s good enough to ship.
Think of it like this:
Maximizing:
— Analyze ALL possible options
— Seek the BEST possible outcome
— Often leads to analysis paralysis
— Perfect is the enemy of done
Satisficing:
— Define acceptable criteria
— Ship when criteria are met
— Iterate based on real feedback
— Done is better than perfect
The Cost of Maximizing (That Nobody Talks About)

Let me paint you a picture I see way too often:
Team A (The Maximizers):
Spent 6 months perfecting their onboarding flow
Tested 12 different variations
Debated button colors for 2 weeks
Shipped a “perfect” solution
Users had already found workarounds
Team B (The Satisficers):
Shipped basic onboarding in 1 month
Monitored actual user behavior
Made incremental improvements
Had 5 months of real data
Already on version 3.0
Which team do you think delivered more value?
Why Most PMs Suck at Satisficing
Here’s the uncomfortable truth: Many of us became PMs because we’re perfectionists. We like control. We enjoy sweating the details. And that makes satisficing feel… wrong.
But here’s what I’ve learned the hard way:
Market timing trumps perfection:
A good solution now beats a perfect solution later
Markets don’t wait for your pixel-perfect design
First-mover advantage is real
Users don’t care about your perfection
They care about their problems
They’ll forgive rough edges if you solve their pain
They’d rather have something useful now than perfect later
Perfect products often fail anyway
Google+ was perfectly engineered
Amazon Fire Phone was beautifully designed
Both failed because perfection ≠ needed
The Satisficing Framework
After painful lessons during my initial years as a PM, here’s the framework I use to decide when something is “good enough” to ship:

1. Define Your Non-Negotiables
Must-Have:
— Core functionality works reliably
— No critical security issues
— Meets basic user needs
— Performance within an acceptable range
Nice to Have:
— Perfect UI consistency
— Edge case handling
— Feature parity with competitors
— Bells and whistles
2. Set Clear “Good Enough” Metrics
What’s the minimum viable performance?
What’s an acceptable error rate?
What level of user satisfaction is enough?
What’s the baseline adoption rate we need?
3. Create Your “Ship It” Checklist
Core user journey works ✓
Major bugs fixed ✓
Basic analytics in place ✓
Support team trained ✓
Rollback plan ready ✓
But Wait, When Should You Maximize?
I’m not saying never maximize. There are times when “good enough” isn’t good enough:
Core Product Promise
If you’re Zoom, video quality can’t be “good enough”
If you’re Stripe, payment processing must be perfect
If you’re 1Password, security can’t be satisfied
Brand Defining Features
Apple maximizes design because it’s their differentiator
Netflix maximizes recommendation accuracy
Spotify maximizes music discovery
Critical User Moments
First-time user experience
Payment flows
Data migration tools
Making the Shift: Practical Steps
Here’s how to start embracing satisficing without losing your product soul:
Start Small
Pick a low-risk feature
Define “good enough” criteria
Ship faster than feels comfortable
Monitor the world not ending
2. Build Trust
Show stakeholders the speed benefits
Document the value delivered earlier
Highlight iterative improvements
Celebrate quick wins
3. Create Safety Nets
Strong monitoring
Easy rollback processes
Clear success metrics
Rapid feedback loops
The Hard Truth About Modern Product Management
The market doesn’t care about your perfect product. It cares about solved problems. While you’re maximizing, your competitors are solving problems. While you’re perfecting, users are finding alternatives.
Remember:
Perfect products are often perfect solutions to yesterday’s problems
The market rewards speed and iteration over perfection
Users prefer “good enough now” over “perfect later”
Stop being a product purist. Start being a product pragmatist. Your users and team will thank you.
Remember: Every day you spend perfecting is a day your users spend suffering with the current solution. Ship it. Learn from it. Improve it.
That’s not just product management. That’s product leadership.
P.S. This post isn’t perfect. I could have spent a few more days polishing it. But it’s good enough to help you think differently about product development. And that’s what matters.